How does the task complexity of masked pretraining objectives affect downstream performance?

Masked language modeling (MLM) is a widely used self-supervised pretraining objective, where a model needs to predict an original token that is replaced with a mask given contexts. Although simpler and computationally efficient pretraining objectives, e.g., predicting the first character of a masked...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Yamaguchi, Atsuki, Ozaki, Hiroaki, Morishita, Terufumi, Morio, Gaku, Sogawa, Yasuhiro
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 18.05.2023
Subjects
Objectives
Task complexity
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Masked language modeling (MLM) is a widely used self-supervised pretraining objective, where a model needs to predict an original token that is replaced with a mask given contexts. Although simpler and computationally efficient pretraining objectives, e.g., predicting the first character of a masked token, have recently shown comparable results to MLM, no objectives with a masking scheme actually outperform it in downstream tasks. Motivated by the assumption that their lack of complexity plays a vital role in the degradation, we validate whether more complex masked objectives can achieve better results and investigate how much complexity they should have to perform comparably to MLM. Our results using GLUE, SQuAD, and Universal Dependencies benchmarks demonstrate that more complicated objectives tend to show better downstream results with at least half of the MLM complexity needed to perform comparably to MLM. Finally, we discuss how we should pretrain a model using a masked objective from the task complexity perspective.
ISSN:2331-8422