A tale of two faults: Statistical reconstruction of the 1820 Flores Sea earthquake using tsunami observations alone

Using a Bayesian approach we compare anecdotal tsunami runup observations from the 29 December 1820 Flores Sea earthquake with close to 200,000 tsunami simulations to determine the most probable earthquake parameters causing the tsunami. Using a dual hypothesis of the source earthquake either origin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Paskett, T, Whitehead, J P, Harris, R A, Ashcroft, C, Krometis, J A, Sorensen, I, Wonnacott, R
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 02.05.2023
Subjects
Bayesian analysis
Earthquakes
Shaking
Tsunamis
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Using a Bayesian approach we compare anecdotal tsunami runup observations from the 29 December 1820 Flores Sea earthquake with close to 200,000 tsunami simulations to determine the most probable earthquake parameters causing the tsunami. Using a dual hypothesis of the source earthquake either originating from the Flores Thrust or the Walanae/Selayar Fault, we found that neither source perfectly matches the observational data, particularly while satisfying seismic constraints of the region. However, there is clear quantitative evidence that a major earthquake on the Walanae/Selayar Fault more closely aligns with historical records of the tsunami, and earthquake shaking. The simulated data available from this study alludes to the potential for a different source in the region or the occurrence of an earthquake near where both faults potentially merge and simultaneously rupture similar to the 2016 Kaikoura, New Zealand event.
ISSN:2331-8422