Questions and Concerns About Google's Quantum Supremacy Claim

In October 2019, Nature published a paper [6] describing an experimental work that was performed at Google. The paper claims to demonstrate quantum (computational) supremacy on a 53-qubit quantum computer. Since then we have been involved in a long-term project to study various statistical aspects o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Kalai, Gil, Rinott, Yosef, Shoham, Tomer
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 01.05.2023
Subjects
Quantum computers
Qubits (quantum computing)
Statistical analysis
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In October 2019, Nature published a paper [6] describing an experimental work that was performed at Google. The paper claims to demonstrate quantum (computational) supremacy on a 53-qubit quantum computer. Since then we have been involved in a long-term project to study various statistical aspects of the Google experiment. In [30] we studied Google's statistical framework that we found to be very sound and offered some technical improvements. This document describes three main concerns (based on statistical analysis) about the Google 2019 experiment. The first concern is that the data do not agree with Google's noise model (or any other specific model). The second concern is that a crucial simple formula for a priori estimation of the fidelity seems to involve an unexpected independence assumption, and yet it gives very accurate predictions. The third concern is about statistical properties of the calibration process.
ISSN:2331-8422