Scaling-up Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search with Landmarks

Landmarks are one of the most effective search heuristics for classical planning, but largely ignored in generalized planning. Generalized planning (GP) is usually addressed as a combinatorial search in a given space of algorithmic solutions, where candidate solutions are evaluated w.r.t.~the instan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Segovia-Aguas, Javier, Jiménez, Sergio, Jonsson, Anders, Sebastiá, Laura
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 10.05.2022
Subjects
Ablation
Combinatorial analysis
Heuristic
Planning
Search algorithms
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Landmarks are one of the most effective search heuristics for classical planning, but largely ignored in generalized planning. Generalized planning (GP) is usually addressed as a combinatorial search in a given space of algorithmic solutions, where candidate solutions are evaluated w.r.t.~the instances they solve. This type of solution evaluation ignores any sub-goal information that is not explicit in the representation of the planning instances, causing plateaus in the space of candidate generalized plans. Furthermore, node expansion in GP is a run-time bottleneck since it requires evaluating every child node over the entire batch of classical planning instances in a GP problem. In this paper we define a landmark counting heuristic for GP (that considers sub-goal information that is not explicitly represented in the planning instances), and a novel heuristic search algorithm for GP (that we call PGP) and that progressively processes subsets of the planning instances of a GP problem. Our two orthogonal contributions are analyzed in an ablation study, showing that both improve the state-of-the-art in GP as heuristic search, and that both benefit from each other when used in combination.
ISSN:2331-8422