Subfield prestige and gender inequality in computing

• Published in: arXiv.org
• Main Authors: LaBerge, Nicholas, K Hunter Wapman, Morgan, Allison C, Zhang, Sam, Larremore, Daniel B, Clauset, Aaron
• Format: Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 09.05.2022
• Subjects: Computation; Demographics; Gender equity; Representations
• ISSN: 2331-8422

Women and people of color remain dramatically underrepresented among computing faculty, and improvements in demographic diversity are slow and uneven. Effective diversification strategies depend on quantifying the correlates, causes, and trends of diversity in the field. But field-level demographic changes are driven by subfield hiring dynamics because faculty searches are typically at the subfield level. Here, we quantify and forecast variations in the demographic composition of the subfields of computing using a comprehensive database of training and employment records for 6882 tenure-track faculty from 269 PhD-granting computing departments in the United States, linked with 327,969 publications. We find that subfield prestige correlates with gender inequality, such that faculty working in computing subfields with more women tend to hold positions at less prestigious institutions. In contrast, we find no significant evidence of racial or socioeconomic differences by subfield. Tracking representation over time, we find steady progress toward gender equality in all subfields, but more prestigious subfields tend to be roughly 25 years behind the less prestigious subfields in gender representation. These results illustrate how the choice of subfield in a faculty search can shape a department's gender diversity.