Towards optimally abstaining from prediction with OOD test examples

A common challenge across all areas of machine learning is that training data is not distributed like test data, due to natural shifts, "blind spots," or adversarial examples; such test examples are referred to as out-of-distribution (OOD) test examples. We consider a model where one may a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Kalai, Adam Tauman, Kanade, Varun
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 28.10.2021
Subjects
Algorithms
Classification
Machine learning
Optimization
Polynomials
Statistical analysis
Training
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:A common challenge across all areas of machine learning is that training data is not distributed like test data, due to natural shifts, "blind spots," or adversarial examples; such test examples are referred to as out-of-distribution (OOD) test examples. We consider a model where one may abstain from predicting, at a fixed cost. In particular, our transductive abstention algorithm takes labeled training examples and unlabeled test examples as input, and provides predictions with optimal prediction loss guarantees. The loss bounds match standard generalization bounds when test examples are i.i.d. from the training distribution, but add an additional term that is the cost of abstaining times the statistical distance between the train and test distribution (or the fraction of adversarial examples). For linear regression, we give a polynomial-time algorithm based on Celis-Dennis-Tapia optimization algorithms. For binary classification, we show how to efficiently implement it using a proper agnostic learner (i.e., an Empirical Risk Minimizer) for the class of interest. Our work builds on a recent abstention algorithm of Goldwasser, Kalais, and Montasser (2020) for transductive binary classification.
ISSN:2331-8422