Technical Report -- Expected Exploitability: Predicting the Development of Functional Vulnerability Exploits

• Published in: arXiv.org
• Main Authors: Suciu, Octavian, Connor, Nelson, Lyu, Zhuoer, Bao, Tiffany, Tudor Dumitras
• Format: Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 03.02.2022
• Subjects: Classifiers; Digital media; Exploitation; Feature extraction; Noise; Noise prediction
• ISSN: 2331-8422

Assessing the exploitability of software vulnerabilities at the time of disclosure is difficult and error-prone, as features extracted via technical analysis by existing metrics are poor predictors for exploit development. Moreover, exploitability assessments suffer from a class bias because "not exploitable" labels could be inaccurate. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new metric, called Expected Exploitability (EE), which reflects, over time, the likelihood that functional exploits will be developed. Key to our solution is a time-varying view of exploitability, a departure from existing metrics. This allows us to learn EE using data-driven techniques from artifacts published after disclosure, such as technical write-ups and proof-of-concept exploits, for which we design novel feature sets. This view also allows us to investigate the effect of the label biases on the classifiers. We characterize the noise-generating process for exploit prediction, showing that our problem is subject to the most challenging type of label noise, and propose techniques to learn EE in the presence of noise. On a dataset of 103,137 vulnerabilities, we show that EE increases precision from 49% to 86% over existing metrics, including two state-of-the-art exploit classifiers, while its precision substantially improves over time. We also highlight the practical utility of EE for predicting imminent exploits and prioritizing critical vulnerabilities. We develop EE into an online platform which is publicly available at https://exploitability.app/.