Efficient Selection Between Hierarchical Cognitive Models: Cross-validation With Variational Bayes

Model comparison is the cornerstone of theoretical progress in psychological research. Common practice overwhelmingly relies on tools that evaluate competing models by balancing in-sample descriptive adequacy against model flexibility, with modern approaches advocating the use of marginal likelihood...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Viet-Hung Dao, Gunawan, David, Tran, Minh-Ngoc, Kohn, Robert, Hawkins, Guy E, Brown, Scott D
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 08.10.2021
Subjects
Adequacy
Algorithms
Bayesian analysis
Cognitive models
Computational efficiency
Decision making
Parameter estimation
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Model comparison is the cornerstone of theoretical progress in psychological research. Common practice overwhelmingly relies on tools that evaluate competing models by balancing in-sample descriptive adequacy against model flexibility, with modern approaches advocating the use of marginal likelihood for hierarchical cognitive models. Cross-validation is another popular approach but its implementation has remained out of reach for cognitive models evaluated in a Bayesian hierarchical framework, with the major hurdle being prohibitive computational cost. To address this issue, we develop novel algorithms that make variational Bayes (VB) inference for hierarchical models feasible and computationally efficient for complex cognitive models of substantive theoretical interest. It is well known that VB produces good estimates of the first moments of the parameters which gives good predictive densities estimates. We thus develop a novel VB algorithm with Bayesian prediction as a tool to perform model comparison by cross-validation, which we refer to as CVVB. In particular, the CVVB can be used as a model screening device that quickly identifies bad models. We demonstrate the utility of CVVB by revisiting a classic question in decision making research: what latent components of processing drive the ubiquitous speed-accuracy tradeoff? We demonstrate that CVVB strongly agrees with model comparison via marginal likelihood yet achieves the outcome in much less time. Our approach brings cross-validation within reach of theoretically important psychological models, and makes it feasible to compare much larger families of hierarchically specified cognitive models than has previously been possible.
ISSN:2331-8422