Off-Policy Evaluation of Slate Policies under Bayes Risk

We study the problem of off-policy evaluation for slate bandits, for the typical case in which the logging policy factorizes over the slots of the slate. We slightly depart from the existing literature by taking Bayes risk as the criterion by which to evaluate estimators, and we analyze the family o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Vlassis, Nikos, Fernando Amat Gil, Chandrashekar, Ashok
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 05.01.2021
Subjects
Estimators
Risk
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:We study the problem of off-policy evaluation for slate bandits, for the typical case in which the logging policy factorizes over the slots of the slate. We slightly depart from the existing literature by taking Bayes risk as the criterion by which to evaluate estimators, and we analyze the family of 'additive' estimators that includes the pseudoinverse (PI) estimator of Swaminathan et al.\ (2017; arXiv:1605.04812). Using a control variate approach, we identify a new estimator in this family that is guaranteed to have lower risk than PI in the above class of problems. In particular, we show that the risk improvement over PI grows linearly with the number of slots, and linearly with the gap between the arithmetic and the harmonic mean of a set of slot-level divergences between the logging and the target policy. In the typical case of a uniform logging policy and a deterministic target policy, each divergence corresponds to slot size, showing that maximal gains can be obtained for slate problems with diverse numbers of actions per slot.
ISSN:2331-8422