Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Bias

Contextualized word embeddings have been replacing standard embeddings as the representational knowledge source of choice in NLP systems. Since a variety of biases have previously been found in standard word embeddings, it is crucial to assess biases encoded in their replacements as well. Focusing o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Bartl, Marion, Nissim, Malvina, Gatt, Albert
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 27.10.2020
Subjects
Bias
Gender
Human bias
Languages
Measurement methods
Morphology
Words (language)
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Contextualized word embeddings have been replacing standard embeddings as the representational knowledge source of choice in NLP systems. Since a variety of biases have previously been found in standard word embeddings, it is crucial to assess biases encoded in their replacements as well. Focusing on BERT (Devlin et al., 2018), we measure gender bias by studying associations between gender-denoting target words and names of professions in English and German, comparing the findings with real-world workforce statistics. We mitigate bias by fine-tuning BERT on the GAP corpus (Webster et al., 2018), after applying Counterfactual Data Substitution (CDS) (Maudslay et al., 2019). We show that our method of measuring bias is appropriate for languages such as English, but not for languages with a rich morphology and gender-marking, such as German. Our results highlight the importance of investigating bias and mitigation techniques cross-linguistically, especially in view of the current emphasis on large-scale, multilingual language models.
ISSN:2331-8422