Water, Globalization, and Liberalization Impact of The Decision of Indonesian Constitutional Court Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 Concerning Water Resources Perspective of The Welfare State

Privatization, liberalization and globalization of water resources in Indonesia has become a complicated problem. In one hand, it will increase the economic values and investment but in the other hands it is contrary with the 1945 Constitution. Indonesian Water Resources Act has raised polemics and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 1
Main Authors Shoviani, Ari, Rodiyah, Rodiyah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Semarang Universitas Negeri Semarang 01.05.2020
Subjects
Complaints
Constitutional courts
Exploitation
Globalization
Judicial reviews
Liberalization
Privatization
Value
Water
Water supply
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Privatization, liberalization and globalization of water resources in Indonesia has become a complicated problem. In one hand, it will increase the economic values and investment but in the other hands it is contrary with the 1945 Constitution. Indonesian Water Resources Act has raised polemics and complaints from many parties, so that the proposed judicial review to the Constitutional Court. Finally, the Court cancelled this Act. This research is intended to analyse and describe the implementation of Water Resources Act that has been cancelled by the Court in the context of Friedman Theory, especially in Semarang City. The research emphasized and highlighted that the exploitation of water resources, as well as privatization and liberalization is not allowed by the 1945 Constitution.
ISSN:2548-1584
2548-1592
DOI:10.15294/jils.v5i1.34017