Reply to the Comment by S. Wirth et al. on "Tuning low-energy scales in YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) by non-isoelectronic substitution and pressure"
Previously, we reported that the doping and pressure dependence of the \(T^\ast(B)\) crossover in YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) is incompatible with its interpretation as signature of a Kondo breakdown [M.-H. Schubert et al., Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032004(R) (2019)]. The comment by S. Wirth et al. [arXiv:1910....
Saved in:
Published in | arXiv.org |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Paper |
Language | English |
Published |
Ithaca
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
12.06.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Previously, we reported that the doping and pressure dependence of the \(T^\ast(B)\) crossover in YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) is incompatible with its interpretation as signature of a Kondo breakdown [M.-H. Schubert et al., Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032004(R) (2019)]. The comment by S. Wirth et al. [arXiv:1910.04108] refers to Hall measurements on undoped YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) and criticizes our study as incomplete and inconclusive. We thoroughly inspect these data and rebut the arguments of the comment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2331-8422 |