Reply to the Comment by S. Wirth et al. on "Tuning low-energy scales in YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) by non-isoelectronic substitution and pressure"

Previously, we reported that the doping and pressure dependence of the \(T^\ast(B)\) crossover in YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) is incompatible with its interpretation as signature of a Kondo breakdown [M.-H. Schubert et al., Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032004(R) (2019)]. The comment by S. Wirth et al. [arXiv:1910....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors M -H Schubert, Tokiwa, Y, S -H Hübner, Mchalwat, M, Blumenröther, E, Jeevan, H S, Gegenwart, P
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 12.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previously, we reported that the doping and pressure dependence of the \(T^\ast(B)\) crossover in YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) is incompatible with its interpretation as signature of a Kondo breakdown [M.-H. Schubert et al., Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032004(R) (2019)]. The comment by S. Wirth et al. [arXiv:1910.04108] refers to Hall measurements on undoped YbRh\(_2\)Si\(_2\) and criticizes our study as incomplete and inconclusive. We thoroughly inspect these data and rebut the arguments of the comment.
ISSN:2331-8422