Is specimen mammorgraphy beneficial?
HYPOTHESIS: Specimen mammography is not beneficial in the management or outcome of patients undergoing image-guided needle-localized breast biopsies. DESIGN: A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent needle/dye-localized breast biopsies between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 199...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) Vol. 135; no. 9; p. 1083 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chicago
American Medical Association
01.09.2000
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | HYPOTHESIS: Specimen mammography is not beneficial in the management or outcome of patients undergoing image-guided needle-localized breast biopsies. DESIGN: A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent needle/dye-localized breast biopsies between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1995. SETTING: National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, Md)-designated comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-four patients underwent 165 needle/dye-localized breast biopsies for suspicious mammographic abnormalities. RESULTS: In only 3 (1.8%) of 165 patients did the patient clearly benefit from specimen mammography. In no patient was a malignant neoplasm missed. The mean time for the specimen mammogram was 20 minutes, adding an additional 55 hours of operating room time. Specimen mammography cost an additional $60,522 and was incorrect in 41 (24.8%) of 165 patients. CONCLUSION: Specimen mammography added little to patient care, as only 3 (1.8%) of 165 patients benefited from the information. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2168-6254 2168-6262 |