APDROŠINĀŠANAS GADĪJUMS SAUSZEMES TRANSPORTLĪDZEKĻU ĪPAŠNIEKU CIVILTIESISKĀS ATBILDĪBAS APDROŠINĀŠANĀ
The article is devoted to the issue, in which in 2017 the Latvian legislator had doubts, returning the amendments to the Compulsory Civil Liability Insurance of Owners of Motor Vehicles Law back to the Cabinet of Ministers and also the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia, referring a question to...
Saved in:
Published in | Turiba University. International Scientific Conference pp. 7 - 14 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Conference Proceeding |
Language | Latvian |
Published |
Riga
Turiba University
01.04.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The article is devoted to the issue, in which in 2017 the Latvian legislator had doubts, returning the amendments to the Compulsory Civil Liability Insurance of Owners of Motor Vehicles Law back to the Cabinet of Ministers and also the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia, referring a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The question is about what event should be recognized as insurable in motor third party liability insurance which is compulsory in accordance with EU law. So, it is important to identify the nature of the problem, the legal framework of it, and to develop proposals for improvement of the existing legal framework in Latvia. General scientific methods as well as special legal research methods - analysis and synthesis methods, comparative method and historical method were used. The research base is analysis of documents, courts decisions, including decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU, legal acts, as well as observations. The research concludes that the Latvian legal framework needs to be interpreted in accordance with EU law without any substantive amendments of the law. |
---|