Quantifying Pilot Contribution to Flight Safety During an In-Flight Airspeed Failure

• Published in: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI). Conference Proceedings
• Main Authors: Etherington, Timothy J, Kramer, Lynda J, Bailey, Randall E, Kennedey, Kellie D
• Format: Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Hampton NASA/Langley Research Center 08.05.2017
• Subjects: Accidents; Aircraft accidents; Aircraft accidents & safety; Aircraft components; Aircraft industry; Aircraft safety; Airlines; Airspeed; Aviation; Boeing aircraft; Civil aviation; Commercial aircraft; Flight crews; Flight operations; Flight safety; Human performance; Independent variables; Integrals; Pilots; System failures; Transport

Accident statistics cite the flight crew as a causal factor in over 60% of large transport fatal accidents. Yet a well-trained and well-qualified crew is acknowledged as the critical center point of aircraft systems safety and an integral component of the entire commercial aviation system. A human-in-the-loop test was conducted using a Level D certified Boeing 737-800 simulator to evaluate the pilot's contribution to safety-of-flight during routine air carrier flight operations and in response to system failures. To quantify the human's contribution, crew complement was used as an independent variable in a between-subjects design. This paper details the crew's actions and responses while dealing with an in-flight airspeed failure. Accident statistics often cite flight crew error (Baker, 2001) as the primary contributor in accidents and incidents in transport category aircraft. However, the Air Line Pilots Association (2011) suggests "a well-trained and well-qualified pilot is acknowledged as the critical center point of the aircraft systems safety and an integral safety component of the entire commercial aviation system." This is generally acknowledged but cannot be verified because little or no quantitative data exists on how or how many accidents/incidents are averted by crew actions. Anecdotal evidence suggest crews handle failures on a daily basis and Aviation Safety Action Program data generally supports this assertion, even if the data is not released to the public. However without hard evidence, the contribution and means by which pilots achieve safety of flight is difficult to define. Thus, ways to improve the human ability to contribute or overcome deficiencies are ill-defined.