AAA Financial Accounting Standards Committee on Other Post-Employment Benefits

The proposed Statement on Financial Accounting Standards, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions, requires more extensive accounting for postretirement benefits and will further improve financial reporting. The provisions of the proposed Statement are similar to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAccounting horizons Vol. 4; no. 1; p. 111
Main Authors Arcady, Alex T, Collins, William A, Heath, Loyd C, Holder, William W, McDonald, Charles, Revsine, Lawrence, Tomassini, Lawrence A, Weygandt, Jerry J, Wyatt, Arthur
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sarasota American Accounting Association 01.03.1990
Subjects
Accounting standards
Amortization
Employers
Financial accounting standards
Financial reporting
Financial statements
Health care
Liabilities
Pensions
Retirement benefits
United States > US
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The proposed Statement on Financial Accounting Standards, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions, requires more extensive accounting for postretirement benefits and will further improve financial reporting. The provisions of the proposed Statement are similar to those of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statements 87, Employers' Accounting for Pensions, and 88, Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits. According to the American Accounting Association (AAA), the correct method for accounting for postretirement benefits is to recognize the obligation as a liability; changes in the liability should be recorded currently in earnings. An explicit approach for determining assumptions on health care cost trend rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, and discount rates should be used. The FASB's proposal to treat plan initiations and amendments as retroactive in those situations in which the employee service period is not specified is reasonable and consistent with pension accounting.
ISSN:0888-7993
1558-7975