Equivariant Bifurcation and Absolute Irreducibility in \(\R^8\) A contribution to the Ize conjecture
M. Field [5] refers to an unpublished work by J. Ize for a result that loss of stability through an absolutely irreducible representation of a compact Lie group leads to bifurcation of steady states. The main ingredient of the proof is the hypotheses, that for an absolutely irreducible representatio...
Saved in:
Published in | arXiv.org |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Paper |
Language | English |
Published |
Ithaca
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
06.09.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | M. Field [5] refers to an unpublished work by J. Ize for a result that loss of stability through an absolutely irreducible representation of a compact Lie group leads to bifurcation of steady states. The main ingredient of the proof is the hypotheses, that for an absolutely irreducible representation of a compact Lie group there exists a closed subgroup whose fixed point space is odd dimensional. Then, using Brouwer degree, one gets the result. We refer to the hypotheses that for an absolutely irreducible representation of a compact Lie group there exists at least one subgroup with an odd dimensional fixed point space as the algebraic Ize conjecture (AIC). Lauterbach and Matthews [10] have shown that the (AIC) is in general not true. In fact they have constructed three infinite families of finite subgroups of SO{4} which act absolutely irreducibly on \(\R^4\) and for each of them any isotropy subgroup has an even dimensional fixed point space. Moreover in [10] it is shown that in spite of this failure of the (AIC) the original conjecture is true at least for groups in two of these three families. In this paper we show a similar bifurcation result for the third family defined in [10]. We go on and construct a family of groups acting absolutely irreducibly on \(\R^8\) which have only even dimensional fixed point spaces. Then we discuss the steady state bifurcations in this case. We end this paper with a discussion on how to extend the results in [10] to larger sets of groups which act on \(\R^{4}\). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2331-8422 |
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1210.2420 |