To Centralize or Not to Centralize: A Tale of Swarm Coordination
Large swarms of autonomous devices are increasing in size and importance. When it comes to controlling the devices of large-scale swarms there are two main lines of thought. Centralized control, where all decisions - and often compute - happen in a centralized back-end cloud system, and distributed...
Saved in:
Published in | arXiv.org |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Paper |
Language | English |
Published |
Ithaca
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
04.05.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Large swarms of autonomous devices are increasing in size and importance. When it comes to controlling the devices of large-scale swarms there are two main lines of thought. Centralized control, where all decisions - and often compute - happen in a centralized back-end cloud system, and distributed control, where edge devices are responsible for selecting and executing tasks with minimal or zero help from a centralized entity. In this work we aim to quantify the trade-offs between the two approaches with respect to task assignment quality, latency, and reliability. We do so first on a local swarm of 12 programmable drones with a 10-server cluster as the backend cloud, and then using a validated simulator to study the tail at scale effects of swarm coordination control. We conclude that although centralized control almost always outperforms distributed in the quality of its decisions, it faces significant scalability limitations, and we provide a list of system challenges that need to be addressed for centralized control to scale. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2331-8422 |