Organizational design consistency: The PennCARE and Henry Ford Health System experiences / Practitioner application
This paper presents the notion of organizational design consistency and defines it as the steady pursuit of a single preferred configuration strategy across key elements of organizational design. To illustrate the framework, the case studies target 4 key elements of organizational design (governance...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of healthcare management Vol. 47; no. 5; p. 307 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chicago
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
01.09.2002
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper presents the notion of organizational design consistency and defines it as the steady pursuit of a single preferred configuration strategy across key elements of organizational design. To illustrate the framework, the case studies target 4 key elements of organizational design (governance structure, organizational culture, strategic planning processes, and decision-making procedures) and explain how consistency across these components adds value to both of these differently configured healthcare systems. There is room enough for diverse configurations of organizations in the current healthcare environment. Consistency does not mandate conformity; value can be derived from both tight and loose models. Furthermore, when fashioning organizational design consistency strategies, healthcare systems should carefully choose tightly or loosely modeled configurations to appropriately suit their aims, their markets, and the capabilities and resources available to them. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1096-9012 1944-7396 |