Oxytetracycline does not cause growth promotion in finfish 1

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 96; no. 5; pp. 1667 - 1677
• Main Authors: Trushenski, Jesse T, Aardsma, Matthew P, Barry, Kelli J, Bowker, James D, Jackson, Christopher J, Jakaitis, Michelle, McClure, Rebecca L, Rombenso, Artur N
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Champaign Oxford University Press 01.05.2018
• Subjects: Abnormalities; Animal growth; Antibiotics; Aquaculture; Bass; Body weight gain; Catfish; Conversion ratio; Diet; Feed additives; Feed conversion; Feeding rates; Fish; Growth promoters; Growth rate; Ictalurus punctatus; Livestock; Oncorhynchus mykiss; Oral administration; Oreochromis niloticus; Oxytetracycline; Physical growth; Regulatory agencies; Salmon; Terrestrial environments; Tilapia; Trout; United States > US
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky120

Until recently, use of antibiotics to enhance terrestrial animal growth performance was a common, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, but controversial practice. There are no FDA-approved production claims for antibiotic drug use in fish, but it is a common misconception that antibiotics are widely used for this purpose in U.S. aquaculture. Antibiotics are not thought to be effective growth promoters in fish, but there is little quantitative data available to address whether there are growth-promoting effects that might incentivize the use of antibiotics in this way, despite legal prohibitions. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine if oral administration of oxytetracycline, an antibiotic with known growth-promoting effects in terrestrial livestock, has a similar effect when applied to channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, hybrid striped bass Morone chrysops x M. saxatilis, Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus, or rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Oxytetracycline products with production claims are typically applied at doses substantially lower than the approved therapeutic doses for the same products. Medication (0, 0.24, or 1.2 g oxytetracycline dihydrate kg-1 feed) and feeding rates (3% BW d-1) were selected to achieve target daily doses of 0, 16, or 80 mg kg-1 fish representing control, subtherapeutic, and therapeutic treatments. Replicate groups of fish (N = 4) were fed accordingly for 8 wk. Overall, oral administration of oxytetracycline did not affect survival or promote growth of the selected taxa, with no significant differences observed for weight gain, feed conversion ratio, or specific growth rate (P > 0.05 in all cases). Few differences were observed in organosomatic indices and in the frequency of tissue abnormalities; where present, these differences tended to suggest a negative effect of long-term dietary exposure to oxytetracycline. These data demonstrate that there is no benefit to dietary supplementation with oxytetracycline for nontherapeutic purposes in a range of economically important finfish species. As such, our results indicate there is little incentive to misuse oxytetracycline products for purposes of growth promotion in U.S. aquaculture.