Association of instruments of functional evaluation of the lumbar spine with the international classification of functioning, disability and health

For evaluation of the lumbar spine dysfunctions, routinely utilize instruments little contacts among themselves, that little cover the overall concept of functionality. The aim was to establish an association between the theoretical aspects involved in the various instruments of evaluation of the lu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMotricidade Vol. 13; pp. 164 - 173
Main Authors Pereira, Luana Caroline Dantas, Machado, Saulo da Cunha, Santana, Mylena Maria Salgueiro, Oliveira, Géssica Uruga, Lustosa, Luma Soares, Da Silva, Walderi Monteiro, Grigolleto, Marzo Edir Da Silva, Neto, Jader PereiradeFarias
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ribeira de Pena Edições Desafio Singular 01.01.2017
Subjects
Back pain
Chronic illnesses
Classification
Content analysis
Disability
International
Patients
Physical therapy
Questionnaires
Rehabilitation
Brazil
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:For evaluation of the lumbar spine dysfunctions, routinely utilize instruments little contacts among themselves, that little cover the overall concept of functionality. The aim was to establish an association between the theoretical aspects involved in the various instruments of evaluation of the lumbar spine and the categories and qualifiers of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The items of the questionnaire were associated to the codes contained in the ICF price, as well as the levels of severity of the instruments with the qualifiers of ICF. The instruments used were: The Visual Analogue Scale of pain, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and Global Perceived Effect Scale. Next, the analysis of content, to survey the areas and categories of the ICF found inside of each instrument. The main items of the ICF related with the questionnaires were those related to mobility. Was not found, any item that could be associated with aspects of body structure and social aspects of ICF. Only one item of one of the questionnaires evaluated environmental factors. The assessment instruments selected point their ratings to aspects linked to mobility; yet, they do not cover all the biopsychosocial aspects of individuals with a disability related to lumbar spine.
ISSN:1646-107X
2182-2972