A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IN NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: COCITATION ANALYSIS

Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) are endowed with a relevant characteristic, which is the restriction for financial profits generation. Studies show a steady growth of this sector and, for increases the competitive advantages, these organizations come to use tools and business strategy methods in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Munik, Juliano, Moura, Louisi Francis, Treinta, Fernanda Tavares, Cestari, José Marcelo Almeida Prado, Deschamps, Fernando, de Lima, Edson Pinheiro, da Costa, Sergio Eduardo Gouvea
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Huntsville American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) 01.01.2017
Subjects
Authorship
Bibliometrics
Business competition
Citation analysis
Cocitation
Decision making
Literature reviews
Nonprofit organizations
Organizations
Performance evaluation
Performance measurement
Research methodology
Scientific papers
Social network analysis
Social networks
Studies
Systematic review
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) are endowed with a relevant characteristic, which is the restriction for financial profits generation. Studies show a steady growth of this sector and, for increases the competitive advantages, these organizations come to use tools and business strategy methods in their decision makings. These methods can contribute to increased competitiveness when they are supported by a Performance Measurement System (PMS). PMS measures the results through performance indicators, providing more accurate controls over the decision-making processes, as an example, when actions involve internal and external environment aspects, such as Cost Measurement, Quality and Stakeholders evaluate and satisfaction. This articles presents a Bibliometric Analysis of a study and Author Cocitations for a sample of scientific articles, developed in parallel with a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) involving disciplines relating to NPOs and PMS. A Systematic Review adopts judicious methods, with a more consistent basis for the quality of information for a set of scientific publications. This information may present biases, through a systematic research, there is a delimitation of the area, the field of investigation, and it excludes the observation of subjective data. The results contribute to the identification of future investigations, generating a research agenda.