Development and Evaluation of User-Friendly Single Vial DOTA-Peptide Kit Formulations, Specifically Designed for Radiolabelling with ^sup 68^Ga from a Tin Dioxide ^sup 68^Ge/^sup 68^Ga Generator

This study was aimed to develop single vial 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-peptide kits to be used with fractionated eluates from a SnO2-based 68Ge/68Ga generator. Kits were formulated with 35 μg DOTA-Tyr3-Thre8-octreotide, DOTA-[Tyr3]-octreotide and DOTA-[NaI3]-octr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular imaging and biology Vol. 19; no. 6; p. 817
Main Authors Prince, Deidré, Rossouw, Daniel, Davids, Claudia, Rubow, Sietske
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer Nature B.V 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study was aimed to develop single vial 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-peptide kits to be used with fractionated eluates from a SnO2-based 68Ge/68Ga generator. Kits were formulated with 35 μg DOTA-Tyr3-Thre8-octreotide, DOTA-[Tyr3]-octreotide and DOTA-[NaI3]-octreotide (DOTATATE, DOTATOC and DOTANOC) and sodium acetate powder, vacuum-dried and stored at −20 °C for up to 12 months. Labelling of the kits was carried out with 2 ml 68Ga eluate. Comparative labelling was carried out using aqueous DOTA-peptide stock solutions kept frozen at −20 °C for up to 12 months. The quality of the kits was found to be suitable over a 1-year storage period (pH, sterility, endotoxin content, radiolabelling efficiency and radiochemical yields of 68Ga-labelled DOTA-peptides). Radiochemical yields ranged from 73 to 83 %, while those obtained from stock solutions from 64 to 79 %. No significant decline in kit labelling yields was observed over a 12-month storage period. The single vial kit formulations met the quality release specifications for human administration and appear to be highly advantageous over using peptide stock solutions in terms of stability and user-friendliness.
ISSN:1536-1632
1860-2002
DOI:10.1007/s11307-017-1077-7