Brief report of efficacy and side effect profile of crossing over to modifiedrelease capsules of methylphenidate in ADHD patients receiving other treatments: case series

OBJECTIVES: Stimulants are recommended as the first-line pharmacotherapy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methylphenidate (MPH) is the most used stimulant. Medikinet Retard has modified-release capsules of MPH (MRC-MPH). In this study, we aimed to report observations on a sample o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKlinik psikofarmakoloji bülteni Vol. 27; no. 3; p. 262
Main Authors Özbaran, Burcu, Köse, Sezen, Ocakoğlu, Fevzi Tuna, Kayış, Hakan, Satar, Ayşegül, Tekin, Uğur
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Istanbul Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI 01.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVES: Stimulants are recommended as the first-line pharmacotherapy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methylphenidate (MPH) is the most used stimulant. Medikinet Retard has modified-release capsules of MPH (MRC-MPH). In this study, we aimed to report observations on a sample of outpatients, who had been previously treated with other agents, but switched to MRC-MPH treatment. These observations focus on the treatment course, efficacy, side effects, and switching reasons.METHODS: We included 20 out of the 163 patients with ADHD, who were previously treated with other medications, and switched to MRC-MPH. Turgay DSM-IV Based Child and Adolescent Behavior Disorders Screening as diagnosing tool and Rating Scale, Barkley’s Stimulants Side Effects Rating Scale for screening side effects and Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity and -Improvement were administered.RESULTS: Patients’ ages ranged between 9 and 17 years. Mean Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) score before the MRC-MPH treatment was 3.2, whereas after treatment it was 3.15. CGI-S scores were not significantly different (p = .593). Loss of appetite (n = 4, 20%) and drowsiness (n = 4, 20%) were the most common adverse events during the MRC-MPH treatment.CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe significant difference between other treatment options and MRC-MPH with respect to efficacy. In terms of side effect profile, Osmotic Release Oral System-MPH was observed to be more problematic than immediate-release MPH and MRC-MPH formulations, while these two regimens did not differ significantly.
ISSN:2475-0573
2475-0581
DOI:10.1080/24750573.2017.1358684