THE ENERGY CONVERSION EFFICIENCY PERSPECTIVE ON PRODUCTIVITY

Engineering managers use productivity measures for performance evaluation and decision-making. The common assessment of productivity normally considers a simple fractional relationship of revenues over costs, where desirable productivity occurs when the system delivers higher revenues than the volum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management p. 1
Main Authors Renken, Katharina, Barraza-Barraza, Diana, Guadalupe, Leonidas
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Huntsville American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) 01.01.2014
Subjects
Costs
Decision making
Efficiency
Energy conservation
Engineering
Management decisions
Manufacturing
Natural resources
Productivity
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Engineering managers use productivity measures for performance evaluation and decision-making. The common assessment of productivity normally considers a simple fractional relationship of revenues over costs, where desirable productivity occurs when the system delivers higher revenues than the volume point of costs, leading to a productivity index value larger than one; implying that the output is greater than the input. However, the second law of thermodynamics states it is impossible to convert energy completely into work in a closed system. Contemporary productivity tools do not follow this law because they assume open systems in which energy can enter and exit a system, and they do not concern themselves with externalities imposed on meta-systems. This leaves an opportunity to create a different perspective on the efficiency of work. This paper uses the laws of thermodynamics to develop a formula that shifts the perception of productivity measures. The dynamics of the formula are explored, and comparative examples show the advantages and disadvantages of this theoretical approach. Results of a pilot survey show that the new proposed method does not have an impact on managerial decisions.