Clinical evaluation of a novel 12-hole irrigated tip catheter ablation system for the treatment of typical atrial flutterâ[euro]"results from the Duo FLAIR clinical study

Higher current density at the proximal end of a six-hole catheter is not irrigated and thus could lead to uneven heating and possibly coagulum and charring. This study tested a novel 12-hole irrigated catheter with six additional holes at the proximal end that provides more uniform cooling during at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology Vol. 37; no. 1; p. 97
Main Authors Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya, Sangrigoli, Robert, Sloan, Stephen, Wiseman, Martin, Weiss, Raul, Molin, Frank, Kanaan, Nabil, Awasthi, Yashasvi, Mahapatra, Srijoy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer Nature B.V 01.06.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Higher current density at the proximal end of a six-hole catheter is not irrigated and thus could lead to uneven heating and possibly coagulum and charring. This study tested a novel 12-hole irrigated catheter with six additional holes at the proximal end that provides more uniform cooling during atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. A total of 188 patients (28 females, 66â[euro][per thousand]±â[euro][per thousand]11 years) were treated for typical AFL at 22 sites in the USA and Canada using Cool Path Duo at 50 W and 45 °C at an irrigation rate of 13 ml/min. The results were compared to historical data from an AFL study which used a six-hole catheter with similar design. A total of 2,725 RF lesions were applied in 188 patients with a mean RF duration of 18.2â[euro][per thousand]±â[euro][per thousand]11.7 min per procedure. Procedural success was achieved in 96.3 % (181 of 188) acutely and 98.3 % (173 of 176) patients at 3 months. Steam pops occurred in 0.6 % of lesions (15 of 2,725) without coagulum or charringâ[euro]¦ Compared to the six-hole irrigated tip catheter, the Cool Path Duo catheter delivered more power (33.8â[euro][per thousand]±â[euro][per thousand]5.9 vs. 29.7â[euro][per thousand]±â[euro][per thousand]5.2 W, pâ[euro][per thousand]<â[euro][per thousand]0.0001) at a lower average tip temperature (34.7â[euro][per thousand]±â[euro][per thousand]1.5 vs. 37.2â[euro][per thousand]±â[euro][per thousand]2.1 °C, pâ[euro][per thousand]<â[euro][per thousand]0.0001) with no statistical differences in either 3-month AFL recurrence or complications. Cool Path Duoâ"¢ irrigated tip catheter is safe and effective in treating typical AFL. When compared to a six-hole irrigated tip catheter, the Cool Path Duo catheter delivers more power at a lower temperature.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-012-9765-3