A Comparison of the Validity of Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Urine Samples II: Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, Phencyclidine, and (±)-11-nor-9-Carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabino

• Published in: Journal of analytical toxicology Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 430 - 443
• Main Authors: STOUT, Peter R, BYNUM, Nichole D, LEWALLEN, Cynthia M, MITCHELL, John M, BAYLOR, Michael R, ROPERO-MILLER, Jeri D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Niles, IL Preston Publications 2010
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Drug addictions; Medical sciences; Toxicology; Amphetamine derivatives; Solid phase extraction; Biological fluid; Tandem mass spectrometry; Chemical analysis; Metabolite; Psychotropic; Metamfetamine; HPLC chromatography; Glutamate receptor; Cannabinoid; Chemical enrichment; Phencyclidine; Sample preparation; Anesthetic; Piperidine derivatives; Hallucinogen; Amfetamine; Drug of abuse; Antagonist; Quantitative analysis; Urine; Validation; CNS stimulant; Coupled method; Elimination; Neuroprotective agent; Sympathomimetic; Gas chromatography; NMDA receptor; Mass spectrometry; Comparative study
• ISSN: 0146-4760; 1945-2403