PS2-3 [Encore]Quizartinib in FLT3-ITD-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: QuANTUM-R Trial Results

• Published in: Annals of oncology Vol. 30; no. Supplement_6
• Main Authors: Cortes, Jorge E, Khaled, Samer, Martinelli, Giovanni, Perl, Alexander E, Ganguly, Siddhartha, Russell, Nigel H, Kramer, Alwin, Dombret, Herve, Hogge, Donna, Jonas, Brian A, Leung, Anskar Yh, Mehta, Priyanka, Montesinos, Pau, Radsak, Markus P, Sica, Simona, Arunachalam, Meena, Holmes, Melissa, Namuyinga, Ruth, Zhang, Yufen, Levis, Mark J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 01.10.2019
• ISSN: 0923-7534; 1569-8041
• DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz374.003

Abstract Background FLT3-ITD mutations occur in about 25% of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with poor outcomes. Pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-ITD AML have worse prognosis and high unmet medical need. Quizartinib (Q) is a potent and selective FLT3i with promising activity and a manageable safety profile. QuANTUM-R was a global, phase 3, randomized trial of Q vs chemotherapy (SC) in pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML (NCT02039726). Methods Pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML w/wo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) were randomized to receive Q or a preselected investigator choice SC: low-dose cytarabine; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC); or fludarabine, cytarabine, and G-CSF with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Prior midostaurin was allowed. Pts receiving HSCT after Q could resume Q after HSCT. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), respectively. Exploratory endpoints included response rate, time to and duration of response, and transplant rate. Results 367 pts were randomized; 245 to Q and 122 to SC. Median follow-up was 23.5 mo. OS hazard ratio (HR) of Q relative to SC was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-0.98; P=.0177). Median OS was 6.2 (95% CI, 5.3-7.2) vs 4.7 (95% CI, 4.0-5.5) mo in Q and SC arms, respectively. EFS HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.70-1.16; P=.1071); median EFS was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.0-1.9) vs 0.9 (95% CI, 0.4-1.3) mo, respectively. Sensitivity analyses and OS subgroup analyses supported Q vs SC. Composite complete response (CRc) was 48% and 27% in Q and SC arms, respectively. Transplant rate was 32% (Q) and 12% (SC). Median time to first CRc was 4.9 wk for Q. The most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in both arms were infections and those associated with cytopenia. Conclusion OS benefit was observed with single-agent Q vs SC in pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML with a favorable Q safety profile, providing evidence of meaningful clinical benefit in pts with limited treatment options.