Understanding the performance of membrane for direct air capture of CO 2

Abstract Direct air capture (DAC) of CO 2 is becoming increasingly important for reducing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. However, the cost and energy requirements associated with DAC make it less economically feasible than carbon capture from flue gases. While various methods like...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied polymer science Vol. 141; no. 3
Main Authors Panja, Palash, Manankandayalage, Chamila, Alam, Maksudul M., Deo, Milind
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons) 24.10.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Direct air capture (DAC) of CO 2 is becoming increasingly important for reducing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. However, the cost and energy requirements associated with DAC make it less economically feasible than carbon capture from flue gases. While various methods like solid sorbents and gas–liquid absorption have been explored for DAC, membrane processes have only recently been investigated. The objective of this study is to examine the separation performance of a membrane unit for capturing CO 2 from ambient air. The performance of a membrane depends on several factors, including the composition of the feed gas, pressure ratio, material selectivity, and membrane area. The single‐stage separation process with the co‐current flow and constant permeability flux model is evaluated using a commercial module integrated with a process simulator to separate a binary mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen to assess the sensitivity of selectivity on purity and recovery of CO 2 in permeate, and power requirement. Additionally, three levels of CO 2 reduction from the feed stream to the retentate stream (25%, 50%, and 75%) are studied. A trade‐off between purity and recovery factor is observed, and achieving high purity in permeate requires high concentration in the retentate.
Bibliography:USDOE
DE‐FE0031968
ISSN:0021-8995