초·중·고등학교 영어 읽기지문의 난이도와 연계성 분석 연구: 2015 개정 영어교과서를 중심으로

The purpose of the present study is to explore the difficulty and continuity analysis of the English reading passages in the elementary, middle and high school English textbooks of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum. The present study compared the continuity of 5th grade elementary school to 1st y...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in영어교과교육, 20(4) pp. 141 - 162
Main Authors 배지영, 김규미
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국영어교과교육학회 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1598-513X
2671-6178
DOI10.18649/jkees.2021.20.4.141

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of the present study is to explore the difficulty and continuity analysis of the English reading passages in the elementary, middle and high school English textbooks of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum. The present study compared the continuity of 5th grade elementary school to 1st year high school English textbooks between grades. For this analysis, 60 English textbooks from elementary to high school were analyzed according to with eight indices from Coh-Metrix, which measured the quantifiable aspects of passages (i.e., the number of words, number of sentences, and average length of a single sentence) and the readability of the target reading texts. As a result of analyzing the three quantifiable elements of learning, it was found that most of the textbooks showed a significant difference and increased the amount of written input by grade from the 5th grade of elementary school to the 1st grade of high school. Additionally, the indicators corresponding to lexical diversity, syntactic complexity and readability showed that the textbooks for the higher grades had more complicated sentence structures and high readability scores. In conclusion, the large difference in difficulty of the English textbooks between grades, from elementary school to middle school and from the third grade of middle school to the first grade of high school, has implications for future curriculum and textbook development. KCI Citation Count: 0
ISSN:1598-513X
2671-6178
DOI:10.18649/jkees.2021.20.4.141