A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/ Β-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
Study Design: Prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Purpose: To evaluate whether the union rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is inferior to that of a...
Saved in:
Published in | Asian spine journal pp. 30 - 38 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
대한척추외과학회
01.02.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Study Design: Prospective randomized noninferiority trial.
Purpose: To evaluate whether the union rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is inferior to that of a mixture of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and HA.
Overview of Literature: There have been no clinical trials investigating the outcomes of a mixture of HA and DBM in a PEEK cage in ACDF.
Methods: Eighty-five eligible patients were randomly assigned to group B (n=43), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and DBM was used, or group C (n=42), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and β-TCP was used. The primary study endpoint was the fusion rate, which was assessed with dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, functional outcome using a neck disability index score, laboratory tests of inflammatory profiles, and the infection rate.
Results: Seventy-seven patients (38 in group B and 39 in group C) were included in the final analysis. One year postoperatively, bone fusion was achieved in 87% of group B patients and 87% of group C patients on dynamic radiographs, and 87% of group B patients and 72% of group C patients on CT scans (p =1.00 and 0.16, respectively). There were also no between-groups differences with respect to the secondary endpoints.
Conclusions: A HA/DBM mixture inside a PEEK cage can provide noninferior outcomes compared to a HA/TCP mixture in ACDF. KCI Citation Count: 1 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1976-1902 1976-7846 |