Comparison of the Predictive Value of Myelography, Computed Tomography and MRI on the Treadmill Test in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

To date, there have been no prospective, objective studies comparing the accuracy of the MRI, myelo-CT and myelography. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic and predictive values of MRIs, myelo-CTs, and myelographies. Myelographies with dynamic motion views, myelo-CTs, MRIs and exe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inYonsei medical journal pp. 806 - 811
Main Authors 문은수, 김학선, 박진오, 신동은, 하종원, 심동준, 곽윤혜, 이광일
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 연세대학교의과대학 01.12.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To date, there have been no prospective, objective studies comparing the accuracy of the MRI, myelo-CT and myelography. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic and predictive values of MRIs, myelo-CTs, and myelographies. Myelographies with dynamic motion views, myelo-CTs, MRIs and exercise treadmill tests were performed in 35 cases. The narrowest AP diameter of the dural sac was measured by myelography. At the pathologic level, dural cross-sectional area (D-CSA) was calculated in the MRI and Myelo-CT. The time to the first symptoms (TAF) and the total ambulation time (TAT) were measured during the exercise treadmill test and used as the standard in the comparison of correlation between radiographic parameters and walking capacity. The mean D-CSA by CT was 58.3mm2 and 47.6mm2 by MRI. All radiographic parameters such as AP diameters and D-CSA have no correlation to TAF or TAT (p>0.05). Our data showed no statistically significant differences in the correlation of the patients' walking capacity to the severity of stenosis as assessed by myelography, myelo-CT and MRI. KCI Citation Count: 33
Bibliography:http://kmbase.medric.or.kr/Main.aspx?d=KMBASE&m=VIEW&i=0311120050460060806
G704-000409.2005.46.6.017
ISSN:0513-5796
1976-2437