유기물 산화율과 부유물질이 총 유기탄소(TOC) 분석방법(고온연소와 UV/과황산)에 미치는 영향 비교

In this study, we investigate some differences and similarities between the two widely used TOC oxidation methods, ultraviolet persulfate (UVP) and high temperature combustion (HTC) oxidation method in terms of standard parameters, the oxidation efficiency of organic compounds and the effect of susp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in환경분석과 독성보건, 19(3) pp. 155 - 162
Main Authors 신현상, 김소희, 이한샘
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국환경분석학회 01.09.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2672-0175
2672-1139

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study, we investigate some differences and similarities between the two widely used TOC oxidation methods, ultraviolet persulfate (UVP) and high temperature combustion (HTC) oxidation method in terms of standard parameters, the oxidation efficiency of organic compounds and the effect of suspended solid (SS) particles. The UVP method yields about 2?3 times better precisions with lower detection limits and showed higher values of TOC (>13%) in the sewage effluent samples (TOC = 2~6, SS = 2~6 mg/L), compared to HTC. On average, both UVP and HTC methods yield good TOC recoveries (>95.8%) for 12 organic compounds, except some chemically recalcitrant molecules (Congo red, Caffeine, Lignin etc.). Comparison of TOC values for the water samples containing sewage sludge particles (SS = 10~50 mg/L) confirmed that the HTC method is preferred in the TOC analysis for the samples containing more than 10 mg/L of SS particles, in which the TOC recoveries (%) for the samples are 61.5±3.8% for HTC and 22.6~51.6% for UVP, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that the two different TOC oxidation methods yield comparable results when analyzing typical environmental water samples containing low concentration of SS (i.e., <~6 mg/L), and the effect of SS particles was discussed with regard to improving the measurement efficiency of particulate organic carbon (POC) in water. KCI Citation Count: 2
Bibliography:G704-001936.2016.19.3.002
ISSN:2672-0175
2672-1139