닫힌계 챔버를 활용한 농업잔재물 연소성분별 배출계수 산정 - 유기성분 중심

This study aims to analyze the Emission Factor (EF) for chemical compounds from agricultural crop residues burning (i.e., rice straw, barley, watermelon stem, onion stem, weed, garlic stalk, persimmon, citrus eggplant, corn stalk, Sweet Potato Stem, and peanut stalk). A closed chamber system for agr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in한국대기환경학회지, 38(3) pp. 470 - 483
Main Authors 배민석, 유근혜, 송명기, 김민성, 오세호, 유근배, 이병태, 한경만
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 한국대기환경학회 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aims to analyze the Emission Factor (EF) for chemical compounds from agricultural crop residues burning (i.e., rice straw, barley, watermelon stem, onion stem, weed, garlic stalk, persimmon, citrus eggplant, corn stalk, Sweet Potato Stem, and peanut stalk). A closed chamber system for agricultural crop residues burning was utilized under controlling the exact flow rate using mass flow controllers. Emission Factor for the detailed compounds such as PM2.5 mass, Organic Carbon (OC), Elemental Carbon (EC), Ionic Compounds (IC), Levoglucosan, etc, Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) using gas chromatography - mass spectrometry were investigated for eleven agricultural crop residues. In the case of incineration of agricultural residues, the average PM2.5 emission factor was 16.8 g/kg with the highest in persimmon. The average emission factors of CO, SOx, and NOx were 180.9, 0.4, and 11.4 g/kg, respectively. Watermelon stem and onion stem showed a high NH3 emission factor due to the influence of fertilizer. The average emission factors for VOCs and PAHs were 0.36 and 0.06 g/kg, respectively. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m&p-xylene, o-xylene, acrylonitrile, and naphthalene accounted for about 80% in the VOCs. The results can be applied to database in Clean Air Policy Support System and will be able to calculate the emission rate for the air quality analyses. KCI Citation Count: 0
Bibliography:https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2022.38.3.470
ISSN:1598-7132
2383-5346
DOI:10.5572/KOSAE.2022.38.3.470