A Study on the Command Priority between Railway Traffic Controllers Based on Railway Control System Using AHP Method

This study compared and analyzed the importance of command priority between railway traffic controllers through pairwise comparison of AHP analysis. 27 railway traffic controllers working on metropolitan railway control center, urban railway control center, and unmanned driving control center respon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 417 - 423
Main Authors Chae, Yun Seok, Kim, Sigon
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 2024
Subjects
Driving trains
Unmanned driving
AHP
Train signal control
Manned driving
Controller
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study compared and analyzed the importance of command priority between railway traffic controllers through pairwise comparison of AHP analysis. 27 railway traffic controllers working on metropolitan railway control center, urban railway control center, and unmanned driving control center responded. As a result of the analysis, all the railway traffic controllers generally recognized the train driving control and train signal control as the most important priorities. For the controller in the manned driving system, a train driving control was the highest at 0.375. On the other hand, the controller based on unmanned driving recognized train signal control as the highest priority at 0.469. In the result of the AHP analysis considering all the variables, the braking system was the highest priority at 0.19 based on manned train driving. On the other hand, the controller based on unmanned train driving recognized wired and wireless network systems and SCADA as the highest priority at 0.267.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202426457638274
ISSN:1015-6348