Improvement of accuracy in radioactivity assessment of medical linear accelerator through self-absorption correction in HPGe detector

Medical linear accelerators with an energy of 8 MV or higher are radiated owing to photonuclear reactions and neutron capture reactions. It is necessary to quantitatively evaluate the concentration of radioactive isotopes when replacing or disposing them. HPGe detectors are commonly used to identify...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNuclear engineering and technology Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 2317 - 2323
Main Authors Suah Yu, Na Hye Kwon, Sang-Rok Kim, Young Jin Won, Kum Bae Kim, Se Byeong Lee, Cheol Ha Baek, Sang Hyoun Choi
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Medical linear accelerators with an energy of 8 MV or higher are radiated owing to photonuclear reactions and neutron capture reactions. It is necessary to quantitatively evaluate the concentration of radioactive isotopes when replacing or disposing them. HPGe detectors are commonly used to identify isotopes and measure radioactivity. However, because the detection efficiency is generally calibrated using a standard material with a density of 1.0 g/cm3, a self-absorption effect occurs if the density of the measured material is high. In this study, self-absorption correction factors were calculated for tungsten, lead, copper, and SUS-303, which are the main materials of medical linear accelerator head parts, for each gamma-ray energy using MCNP 6.2 code. The self-absorption effect was more pronounced as the energy of the emitted gamma rays decreased and the density of the measured materials increased. These correction factors were applied to the radioactivity measurements of the in-built and portable HPGe detectors. Furthermore, compared to the surface dose rate measured by the survey meter, the accuracy of the measurements of radioactivity improved by an average of 124.31 and 100.53 % for inbuilt and portable HPGe detectors, respectively. The results showed a good agreement, with an average difference of 3.70 and 5.24 %.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202424657672810
ISSN:1738-5733
2234-358X