Accuracy of Body Mass Index-defined Obesity Status in US Firefighters

Obesity is a significant problem affecting United States (US) firefighters. While body mass index (BMI) is widely used to diagnose obesity, its use for this occupational group has raised concerns about validity. We examined rates and types of misclassification of BMI-based obesity status compared to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSafety and health at work Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 161 - 164
Main Authors Jitnarin, Nattinee, Poston, Walker S.C, Haddock, Christopher K, Jahnke, Sara A, Day, Rena S
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Obesity is a significant problem affecting United States (US) firefighters. While body mass index (BMI) is widely used to diagnose obesity, its use for this occupational group has raised concerns about validity. We examined rates and types of misclassification of BMI-based obesity status compared to body fat percentage (BF%) and waist circumference (WC). Male career firefighters (N = 994) from 20 US departments completed all three body composition assessments. Mean BMI, BF%, and WC were $29kg/m^2$, 23%, and 97 cm, respectively. Approximately 33% and 15% of BF%- and WC-defined obese participants were misclassified as non-obese (false negatives) using BMI, while 8% and 9% of non-obese participants defined by BF% and WC standards were identified as obese (false positives) using BMI. When stratified by race/ethnicity, Pacific Islanders showed high rates of false positive misclassification. Precision in obesity classification would be improved by using WC along with BMI to determine firefighters' weight status.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201413753019507
ISSN:2093-7911
2093-7997