Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework

PURPOSE. This study compared the accuracy of an abutment-framework (A-F) taken with open tray impression technique combining cement-on crown abutments, a metal framework and resin cement to closed tray and resin-splinted open tray impression techniques for the 3-implant definitive casts. The effect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of advanced prosthodontics Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 25 - 31
Main Authors Lee, Hyeok-Jae, Lim, Young-Jun, Kim, Chang-Whe, Choi, Jung-Han, Kim, Myung-Joo
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PURPOSE. This study compared the accuracy of an abutment-framework (A-F) taken with open tray impression technique combining cement-on crown abutments, a metal framework and resin cement to closed tray and resin-splinted open tray impression techniques for the 3-implant definitive casts. The effect of angulation on the accuracy of these 3 techniques was also evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Three definitive casts, each with 3 linearly positioned implant analogs at relative angulations 0, 30, and 40 degrees, were fabricated with passively fitted corresponding reference frameworks. Ten impressions were made and poured, using each of the 3 techniques on each of the 3 definitive casts. To record the vertical gap between reference frameworks and analogs in duplicate casts, a light microscope with image processing was used. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test. RESULTS. The open tray techniques showed significantly smaller vertical gaps compare to closed tray technique (P < .05). The closed tray and the resin-splinted open tray technique showed significantly different vertical gaps according to the angulation of implant (P < .05), but the A-F impression technique did not (P > .05). CONCLUSION. The accuracy of the A-F impression technique was superior to that of conventional techniques, and was not affected by the angulation of the implants.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201019451500293
ISSN:2005-7806
2005-7814