Nutrient Challenge Testing Is Not Equivalent to Scintigraphy-Lactulose Hydrogen Breath Testing in Diagnosing Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Background/Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a common condition in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Recently, a combined scintigraphy-lactulose hydrogen breath test (ScLHBT) was described as an accurate tool diagnosing SIBO. We aim to analyze whether a lactulose nutrient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 514 - 520
Main Authors Valeria Schindler, Martin Huellner, Fritz Murray, Larissa Schnurre, Anton S Becker, Valentine Bordier, Daniel Pohl
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한소화기기능성질환·운동학회 31.10.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a common condition in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Recently, a combined scintigraphy-lactulose hydrogen breath test (ScLHBT) was described as an accurate tool diagnosing SIBO. We aim to analyze whether a lactulose nutrient challenge test (NCT), previously shown to separate DGBI from healthy volunteers, is equivalent to ScLHBT in diagnosing SIBO. Methods We studied data of 81 DGBI patients undergoing ScLHBT with 30 g lactulose and 300 mL water as well as NCT with 30 g lactulose and a 400 mL liquid test meal. Differences in proportion of positive SIBO diagnoses according to specified cecal load and time criteria for NCT and ScLHBT, respectively, were tested in an equivalence trial. An odds ratio (OR) range of 0.80-1.25 was considered equivalent. Results Diagnosis of SIBO during NCT was not equivalent to SIBO diagnosis in ScLHBT, considering a hydrogen increase before cecal load of 5.0%, 7.5%, or 10.0%, respectively ([OR, 3.76; 90% CI, 1.99-7.09], [OR, 1.87; 90% CI, 1.06-3.27], and [OR, 1.11; 90% CI, 0.65- 1.89]). Considering only time to hydrogen increase as criterion, the odds of a positive SIBO diagnosis in the NCT (0.65) was lower than in ScLHBT (1.70) (OR, 0.38; 90% CI, 0.23-0.65). Conclusions This study could not show an equivalence of NCT and ScLHBT in diagnosing SIBO. A possible explanation might be the different transit times owing to unequal testing substances. The effect of this deviation in relation to consecutive therapy regimens should be tested in further prospective studies. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020;26:514-520)
Bibliography:The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Motility
ISSN:2093-0879
2093-0887