Endoscopic Experience Improves Interobserver Agreement in the Grading of Esophagitis by Los Angeles Classification ; Conventional Endoscopy and Optimal Band Image System

Background/Aims: Interobserver variation by experience was documented for the diagnosis of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether interobserver agreement can be improved by higher levels of endoscopic experience in the diagnosis of erosive eso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut and liver Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 154 - 159
Main Authors Si Hyung Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Kyeong Ok Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Joong Goo Kwon, Eun Young Kim, Jin Tae Jung, Kyung Sik Park, Kwnag Bum Cho, Eun Soo Kim, Chang Geun Park, Chang Heon Yang
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한소화기기능성질환·운동학회 30.03.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/Aims: Interobserver variation by experience was documented for the diagnosis of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether interobserver agreement can be improved by higher levels of endoscopic experience in the diagnosis of erosive esophagitis. Methods: Endoscopic images of 51 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were obtained with conventional endoscopy and optimal band imaging (OBI). Endoscopists were divided into an expert group (16 gastroenterologic endoscopic special-ists guaranteed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) and a trainee group (individuals with fellow-ships, first year of specialty training in gastroenterology). All endoscopists had no or minimal experience with OBI. GERD was diagnosed using the Los Angeles classification with or without OBI. Results: The mean weighted paired κ statistics for interobserver agreement in grading erosive esophagitis by conventional endoscopy in the expert group was better than that in the trainee group (0.51 vs 0.42, p<0.05). The mean weighted paired k statistics in the expert group and in the trainee group based on conventional endoscopy with OBI did not differ (0.42, 0.42). Conclusions: Interobserver agree-ment in the expert group using conventional endoscopy was better than that in the trainee group. Endoscopic experience can improve the interobserver agreement in the grading of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification. (Gut Liver 2014;8:154-159)
Bibliography:The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Motility
ISSN:1976-2283
2005-1212