논평참조 : 간세포암종 진단에 유의한 PIVKA-II 값의 제시- ROC Curve를 이용하여

Background/Aims: Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), also known as des-carboxyprothrombin (DCP), can be used as an alternative tool to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aims of the present study were to compare PIVKA- II lev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and molecular hepatology Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 404 - 411
Main Authors 김명진, Myong Jin Kim, 배강우, Kang Woo Bae, 서평주, Pyoung Ju Seo, 정인국, In Kook Jeong, 김정혁, Jung Hyuk Kim, 이보한, Bo Han Lee, 방기태, Ki Tae Bang, 김동우, Dong Woo Kim, 송일한, Il Han Song
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한간학회 25.09.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/Aims: Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), also known as des-carboxyprothrombin (DCP), can be used as an alternative tool to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aims of the present study were to compare PIVKA- II levels between the patients with HCC and patients with non-HCC chronic liver disease, to evaluate the correlation of PIVKA-II and AFP in HCC patients, and finally to estimate the optimal cut-off value for PIVKA-II for the diagnosis of HCC with using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Methods: A total of 227 consecutive patients with HCC (n=42) or chronic liver disease (n=185) were enrolled in this study. HCC was diagnosed histologically or by imaging such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or angiography. The serum PIVKA-II and AFP levels were measured by electrochemiluminoimmunoassay with using the Haicatch PIVKA-II kit and by immunoradiometric assay, respectively. Results: The PIVKA-II level in the HCC patients was significantly higher than the non-HCC chronic liver disease patients (903.0±1156.7 vs. 111.7±211.0 mAU/ mL, respectively, P<0.01). PIVKA-II and AFP showed a statistical correlation in HCC patients (r=0.46, P<0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of PIVKA-II for the diagnosis of HCC were 66.7% and 74.1%, respectively, and when tasted together with AFP, the sensitivity was increased by 85.7%. For the ROC curve of PIVKA-II in HCC patients, the specificity of a 250 mAU/mL level of PIVKA-II was 95%. Conclusions: PIVKA-II was as useful surveillance tool for differentiating HCC from chronic liver disease, and a PIVKA-II value of 250 mAU/ mL was proposed as a significant cut-off value for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Bibliography:The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN:2287-2728
2287-285X