Institutionalizing Evidence-Informed Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage Lessons From Indonesia

Planning and administering Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policies involve complex and critical decisions, especially in resource-scarce and densely populated settings such as Indonesia. Increasing investments alone do not ensure success and sustainability of UHC, and defining priorities is imperat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInquiry (Chicago) Vol. 57; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Sharma, Manushi, Teerawattananon, Yot, Luz, Alia, Li, Ryan, Rattanavipapong, Waranya, Dabak, Saudamini
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sage Publications Inc 01.01.2020
01.12.2020
Subjects
Original Research
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Planning and administering Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policies involve complex and critical decisions, especially in resource-scarce and densely populated settings such as Indonesia. Increasing investments alone do not ensure success and sustainability of UHC, and defining priorities is imperative. In 2013, Indonesia formally embarked on its journey of institutionalizing priority setting with technical assistance from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI), which is a global network of organizations in pursuit of evidence-based priority setting. This article provides a perspective for countries in pursuit of institutionalization of evidence-informed policy setting systems and sheds light on the factors conducive to the development of health technology assessment (HTA). It explores the main actors and the context of priority setting in Indonesia and articulates strategies and key outcomes and impact using the theory of change (ToC).
ISSN:0046-9580
1945-7243