Representation at Digital Humanities Conferences (2000–2015)
Digital humanities (DH), we are told, exists under a “big tent,” with porous borders, little gatekeeping, and, heck, everyone’s just plain “nice.” Indeed, the term itself is not used definitionally, but merely as a “tactical convenience” to get stuff done without worrying so much about traditional d...
Saved in:
Published in | Bodies of Information p. 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
University of Minnesota Press
08.01.2019
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Digital humanities (DH), we are told, exists under a “big tent,” with porous borders, little gatekeeping, and, heck, everyone’s just plain “nice.” Indeed, the term itself is not used definitionally, but merely as a “tactical convenience” to get stuff done without worrying so much about traditional disciplinary barriers. DH is “global,” “public,” and diversely populated. It will “save the humanities” from its crippling self-reflection (cf. this essay), while simultaneously saving the computational social sciences from their uncritical approaches to data. DH contains its own mirror: it is both humanities done digitally and the digital as scrutinized humanistically. As opposed to |
---|---|
ISBN: | 9781517906115 1517906113 |