Nicotine Replacement, Topography, and Smoking Phenotypes of E-cigarettes

• Published in: Tobacco regulatory science Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 352 - 362
• Main Authors: Strasser, Andrew A., Souprountchouk, Valentina, Kaufmann, Amanda, Blazekovic, Sonja, Leone, Frank, Benowitz, Neal L., Schnoll, Robert A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Tobacco Regulatory Science Group 01.10.2016
• Subjects: Cotinine; E-Cigarette; Nicotine Craving; Nicotine Withdrawal; Smoking Behavior; Vaping
• ISSN: 2333-9748; 2333-9748
• DOI: 10.18001/TRS.2.4.7

Objectives: Little is known about the degree of nicotine replacement across first-generation e-cigarette brands, how e-cigarettes are used, and if there is variation across brands in relevant smoking phenotypes. The objective of this project was to collect data that are critical to better understanding, use, and exposure when using e-cigarettes, which may then inform clinical trials and tobacco regulatory policy. Methods: Twenty-eight cigarette smokers were randomized to use one of 5 popular brands of e-cigarettes for a 10-day study. Day 1 (own cigarette brand) data established baseline levels for cotinine, carbon monoxide (CO), topography, cigarette liking, withdrawal, and craving. Participants returned on Days 5 and 10 to reassess these measures while exclusively using e-cigarettes. Results: Compared to cigarette smoking, e-cigarettes provided significantly lower nicotine levels (25%-50%), reduced CO exposure, and lower ratings of liking (p < .05). Topography significantly differed between cigarette and e-cigarette sessions (p < .05). All brands significantly reduced withdrawal and craving (p < .05). There were no significant brand differences in outcome measures associated with exposure or use. Conclusions: E-cigarettes are not liked as much as cigarettes, provide significantly lower nicotine replacement, reduce CO exposure, and mitigate withdrawal and craving. The patterns of use significantly differ compared to cigarette smoking.