Do PRSPs empower poor countries and disempower the World Bank, or is it the other way round?
Policy reforms imposed on developing countries through conditionality have greatly weakened the autonomy of recipient countries. The vast majority of poor countries in Africa, and many in Latin America and Asia, have been subject to a series of IMF and World Bank adjustment packages, especially over...
Saved in:
Published in | Globalization and the Nation State pp. 310 - 342 |
---|---|
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
Routledge
2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.4324/9780203323441-18 |
Cover
Summary: | Policy reforms imposed on developing countries through conditionality
have greatly weakened the autonomy of recipient countries. The vast
majority of poor countries in Africa, and many in Latin America and Asia,
have been subject to a series of IMF and World Bank adjustment packages,
especially over the last 20 years. These reforms cover all the major economic decisions – budgets, tax and expenditure policies, exchange rates,
trade and tariff policies, price policies, privatization, credit policies – such
that countries subject to them have very little control over their economic
policies. Moreover, sectoral adjustment policies additionally expand the
scope of conditionalities – including education and health policies for
example. The Comprehensive Development Framework of the World
Bank further extends the realm of potential conditionality into the law
and matters of governance. Conditionality thus has been a major source
of disempowerment whether or not the policy reforms are in the recipient
countries’ longer-term interests. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.4324/9780203323441-18 |