Zero Trust Security Implementation: A Brief Study

Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) are evolving due to the limitations of cyber defences built on traditional security architectures to protect critical assets. ZTA or Zero Trust (ZT) eliminates implicit trust as a 'Never Trust, Always Verify' thought to strengthen organisations by continuousl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2025 International Conference on Electronics, AI and Computing (EAIC) pp. 1 - 6
Main Authors Rao, Atul, Ranga, Virender
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 05.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) are evolving due to the limitations of cyber defences built on traditional security architectures to protect critical assets. ZTA or Zero Trust (ZT) eliminates implicit trust as a 'Never Trust, Always Verify' thought to strengthen organisations by continuously authenticating, verifying and validating network resource access requests. As reported by many cyber security agencies, insider threats (approx. 70%) are increasing in comparison to outsider threats. A strong security model must be necessary. ZTA or ZT provides the solutions to safeguard the assets and is also a replacement for Virtual Private Networks. A comprehensive assessment of ZTA is necessary to understand as emerging ZT solutions are capable of defence against cyberattacks and vulnerabilities. Implementing Zero Trust Architecture demands a comprehensive, multi-layered strategy that includes robust identity management, stringent access controls, continuous monitoring, micro-segmentation, and automation. By leveraging these techniques, organizations can significantly reduce their attack surface, enhance data protection, and build a more resilient security framework that adapts to growing cyber threats. As most organizations move toward cloud-based and remote work environments, adopting a zero-trust model is no longer an option but an inevitability for robust cybersecurity.
DOI:10.1109/EAIC66483.2025.11101299