Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Bronchial Responsiveness to Adenosine 5â²-Monophosphate in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis
Study objectives: To determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) between subjects with allergic rhinitis with and without increased responsiveness to direct and indirect bronchoconstrictor agents. Study design: Cross-sectional study with the order of challenge tests randomized. Setting: Spec...
Saved in:
Published in | Chest Vol. 121; no. 6; p. 1853 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
American College of Chest Physicians
01.06.2002
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Study objectives: To determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) between subjects with allergic rhinitis with and without increased
responsiveness to direct and indirect bronchoconstrictor agents.
Study design: Cross-sectional study with the order of challenge tests randomized.
Setting: Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.
Patients: Thirty-eight subjects without asthma with allergic rhinitis and 10 healthy nonatopic control subjects.
Measurements and results: Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of adenosine 5â²monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine. ENO was
measured with the single-exhalation method. A positive response to both bronchoconstrictor agents was detected in nine subjects
with allergic rhinitis, whereas four subjects showed increased responsiveness to AMP but not to methacholine. The geometric
mean (range) ENO values were significantly higher in subjects with allergic rhinitis with increased responsiveness to either
methacholine or AMP than in subjects with normal responsiveness to both agonists: 51.3 parts per billion (ppb) [22.0 to 108.5
ppb] vs 25.1 ppb (5.7 to 102.9 ppb, respectively; p = 0.007) and healthy control subjects (11.2 ppb [5.0 to 31.9 ppb], p <
0.001). Subjects with allergic rhinitis with normal responsiveness to both agonists also had higher concentrations of ENO
than healthy control subjects (p = 0.007). No correlation was found between ENO and either of the provocative concentrations
of methacholine or AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV 1 .
Conclusions: In subjects without asthma but with allergic rhinitis, the presence of bronchoconstriction in response to methacholine or
AMP is associated with increased ENO concentrations. However, elevated concentrations of ENO are detected even in subjects
with allergic rhinitis without airway hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness
is not the only factor that determines the increased NO levels detected in subjects with allergic rhinitis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-3692 1931-3543 |
DOI: | 10.1378/chest.121.6.1853 |