Evaluation of Pre-existent Immunity in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer

Purpose: Breast cancers are known to frequently (over)express several well-characterized tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) such as carcinoembryonic antigen, MUC-1, Her-2/neu, and cancer/testis antigens such as NY-ESO-1, SSX-2, and members of the MAGE family. Whereas in melanoma patients, the detectio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical cancer research Vol. 9; no. 12; p. 4376
Main Authors Christine Rentzsch, Simone Kayser, Susanne Stumm, Iris Watermann, Steffen Walter, Stefan Stevanoviç, Diethelm Wallwiener, Brigitte Gückel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Association for Cancer Research 01.10.2003
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: Breast cancers are known to frequently (over)express several well-characterized tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) such as carcinoembryonic antigen, MUC-1, Her-2/neu, and cancer/testis antigens such as NY-ESO-1, SSX-2, and members of the MAGE family. Whereas in melanoma patients, the detection of pre-existing T cell responses to tumor-associated differentiation antigens was a rationale to initiate several vaccination strategies, little is known thus far concerning tumor-specific immunity in breast cancer patients. The objectives of our study were ( a ) to modify and compare different immunodiagnostic T cell assays with regard to their suitability for clinical applications and ( b ) to determine endogenous TAA-specific T cell immunity of breast cancer patients at the time point of primary diagnosis. Experimental Design: Using MUC-1- and Her-2/neu-derived HLA-A*0201-restricted peptides as model antigens, we analyzed antigen-dependent IFN-γ release of T cells by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay, intracellular cytokine flow cytometry (CytoSpot), and quantitative real-time PCR. As an assay independent of T cell function, we performed tetramer staining. Results: In our hands, the quantitative real-time PCR method is most sensitive and a feasible screening test to perform an “immunological staging” of cancer patients. By doing this, we detected in 7 of 13 (54%) of HLA-A*0201 + breast cancer patients a pre-existent specific cellular immune response to at least one of the investigated TAAs (MUC-1, Her-2/neu, carcinoembryonic antigen, NY-ESO-1, and SSX-2). Four of 21 patients (19%) were found to have a significant Her-2/neu-specific T cell response as defined by a stimulation index ≥ 2 (range, 10–88). Conclusions: Although the clinical relevance of endogenous TAA-specific immunity remains unclear, our findings suggest that patients with primary breast cancer can mount a T cell immune response to their tumor that might be beneficially enhanced by TAA-dependent vaccination strategies in the adjuvant situation.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265