The Second Intracellular Loop of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Recognizes C Termini of G-protein α-Subunits
Heptahelical receptor coupling selectivity to G-proteins is controlled by a large contact area that involves several portions of the receptor and each subunit of the G-protein. In the G-protein α subunit, the C-terminal 5 residues, the N terminus, and the αN-β1 and α4âα5 loops play important...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 278; no. 37; p. 35063 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
12.09.2003
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Heptahelical receptor coupling selectivity to G-proteins is controlled by a
large contact area that involves several portions of the receptor and each
subunit of the G-protein. In the G-protein α subunit, the C-terminal 5
residues, the N terminus, and the αN-β1 and α4âα5
loops play important roles. On the receptor side, both the second and third
(i2 and i3) intracellular loops as well as the C-terminal tail probably
contact these different regions of the G-protein. It is now accepted that the
C terminus of the α subunit binds in a cavity formed by the i2 and i3
loops. Among the various G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), class III
receptors that include metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors greatly differ
from the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, but the contact zone between these receptors
and the G-protein is less understood. The C terminus of the α subunit
has been shown to play a pivotal role in the selective recognition of class
III GPCRs. Indeed, the mGlu2 and mGlu4 and -8 receptors can discriminate
between α subunits that differ at the level of their C-terminal end only
(such as G qo and G qz ). Here, we examine the role of the
i2 loop of mGluRs in the selective recognition of this region of the α
subunit. To that aim, we analyzed the coupling properties of mGlu2 and mGlu4
or -8 receptors and chimeras containing the i2 loop of the converse receptor
to G-protein α subunits that only differ by their C termini
(G qo ,G qz , and their point mutants). Our data demonstrate
that the central portion of the i2 loop is responsible for the selective
recognition of the C-terminal end of the α subunit, especially the
residue on position â4. These data are consistent with the proposal that
the C-terminal end of the G-protein α subunit interacts with residues in
a cavity formed by the i2 and i3 loops in class III GPCRs, as reported for
class I GPCRs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1074/jbc.M306555200 |