Causal analyses to study autonomic regulation during acute head‐out water immersion, head‐down tilt and supine position

• Published in: Experimental physiology Vol. 105; no. 8; pp. 1216 - 1222
• Main Authors: Corbier, Christophe, Chouchou, Florian, Roche, Frédéric, Barthélémy, Jean‐claude, Pichot, Vincent
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley-Blackwell 12.06.2020
• Subjects: Engineering Sciences; Human health and pathology; Life Sciences; Signal and Image processing; Tissues and Organs; Granger causality analysis; water immersion; autonomic regulation
• ISSN: 0958-0670; 1469-445X
• DOI: 10.1113/EP088640

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Can Granger causality analysis of R–R intervals, systolic blood pressure and respiration provide evidence for the different physiological mechanisms induced during thermoneutral water immersion, 6 deg head‐down tilt and supine position tests that are not accessible using traditional heart rate variability and baroreflex methods? What is the main finding and its importance? The Granger analysis demonstrated a significant difference in the causal link from R–R intervals to respiration between water immersion and head‐down tilt. The underlying physiological mechanism explaining this difference could be the variation in peripheral resistances. Abstract Thermoneutral head‐out water immersion (WI) and 6 deg head‐down tilt (HDT) are used to simulate SCUBA diving, swimming and microgravity, because these models induce an increase in central blood volume. Standard methods to analyse autonomic regulation have demonstrated an increase in parasympathetic activity and baroreflex sensitivity during these experimental conditions. However, such methods are not adapted to quantify all closed‐loop interactions involved in respiratory and cardiovascular regulation. To overcome this limitation, we used Granger causality analysis between R–R intervals (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and respiration (RE) in eight young, healthy subjects, recorded during 30 min periods in the supine position, WI and HDT. For all experimental conditions, we found a bidirectional causal relationship between RE and RR and between RR and SBP, with a dominant direction from RR to SBP, and a unidirectional causality from RE to SBP. These causal relationships remained unchanged for the three experimental tests. Interestingly, there was a lower causal relationship from RR to RE during WI compared with HDT. This causal link from RR to RE could be modulated by peripheral resistances. These results highlight differences in cardiovascular regulation during WI and HDT and confirm that Granger causality might reveal physiological mechanisms not accessible with standard methods.